The panel also found the lower court misread a key witness. It had said a psychologist Benetis retained to evaluate her never connected the treatment to the crash. In fact, the court found, she testified the accident was the “direct and proximate cause” of Benetis’s PTSD, major depressive disorder and panic disorder. By doubting her, the judge had strayed into weighing credibility – a jury’s role, not the court’s.
Trending
- Can Limiting Sugar in Early Life Reduce Dementia Risk Decades Later?
- Hertz Promo Codes: Up to 25% Off Rentals | Condé Nast Traveler
- Data center insurance’s next challenges: BI, credit and power
- The Common HSA Mistake That Could Cost You in Retirement
- Advisers Turn to Market Protection Strategies Amid Investor Anxiety
- Dr. Levidia Strauss: Why Gut Health Holds the Key to Menopause
- Phil Heath’s Arm Workout: The 3 Exercises That Built 22-Inch Biceps
- Queen Elizabeth Said This Habit Was “Just So Wasteful”
